HyperSwitchvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HyperSwitch | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Fintech | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 45 532 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 621 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.127.0 · 23 Sept 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
HyperSwitch scores 81/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for HyperSwitch.
HyperSwitch is growing faster right now (+1 621 stars in 30 days).
HyperSwitch details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep HyperSwitch, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with