HyperSwitchvswger
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HyperSwitch | wger | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Fintech | #1 of 31 in Health & Fitness |
| GitHub stars | 45 523 | 7 203 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 612 | +240 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 4 |
| Latest release | v1.127.0 · 23 Sept 2026 | 2.7 · 3 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
HyperSwitch scores 81/100 against 73/100 for wger, so it is the safer default.
wger ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for HyperSwitch.
If you want the quickest setup, wger is easier to run; HyperSwitch needs more configuration.
HyperSwitch is growing faster right now (+1 612 stars in 30 days).
HyperSwitch details →wger details →
Swap a project
Keep HyperSwitch, compare it with
Keep wger, compare it with