HyperSwitchvsTypebot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HyperSwitch | Typebot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Fintech | #1 of 6 in Chatbot |
| GitHub stars | 45 532 | 10 587 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 621 | +223 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.127.0 · 23 Sept 2026 | v3.19.1 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
HyperSwitch scores 81/100 against 70/100 for Typebot, so it is the safer default.
Typebot ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for HyperSwitch.
If you want the quickest setup, Typebot is easier to run; HyperSwitch needs more configuration.
HyperSwitch is growing faster right now (+1 621 stars in 30 days).
HyperSwitch details →Typebot details →
Swap a project
Keep HyperSwitch, compare it with
Keep Typebot, compare it with