HyperSwitchvsTelegraf
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HyperSwitch | Telegraf | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Fintech | #9 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 45 523 | 17 885 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 612 | +54 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 16 |
| Latest release | v1.127.0 · 23 Sept 2026 | v1.40.2 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Go |
Which one should you pick?
HyperSwitch scores 81/100 against 78/100 for Telegraf, so it is the safer default.
Telegraf ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for HyperSwitch.
If you want the quickest setup, Telegraf is easier to run; HyperSwitch needs more configuration.
HyperSwitch is growing faster right now (+1 612 stars in 30 days).
HyperSwitch details →Telegraf details →
Swap a project
Keep HyperSwitch, compare it with
Keep Telegraf, compare it with