HyperSwitchvsSRS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HyperSwitch | SRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Fintech | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 45 532 | 29 391 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 621 | +112 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 13 |
| Latest release | v1.127.0 · 23 Sept 2026 | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | C |
Which one should you pick?
HyperSwitch scores 81/100 against 78/100 for SRS, so it is the safer default.
SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for HyperSwitch.
If you want the quickest setup, SRS is easier to run; HyperSwitch needs more configuration.
HyperSwitch is growing faster right now (+1 621 stars in 30 days).
HyperSwitch details →SRS details →
Swap a project
Keep HyperSwitch, compare it with
Keep SRS, compare it with