HyperSwitchvsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HyperSwitch | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Fintech | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 45 517 | 35 795 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 606 | +834 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 28 |
| Latest release | v1.127.0 · 23 Sept 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Go |
Which one should you pick?
HyperSwitch and SeaweedFS score the same (81/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for HyperSwitch.
If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; HyperSwitch needs more configuration.
HyperSwitch details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep HyperSwitch, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with