HyperSwitchvsResume-Matcher
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HyperSwitch | Resume-Matcher | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Fintech | #1 of 12 in Document Processing |
| GitHub stars | 45 536 | 28 921 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 625 | +407 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.127.0 · 23 Sept 2026 | v1.4.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
HyperSwitch and Resume-Matcher score the same (81/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Resume-Matcher ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for HyperSwitch.
If you want the quickest setup, Resume-Matcher is easier to run; HyperSwitch needs more configuration.
HyperSwitch is growing faster right now (+1 625 stars in 30 days).
HyperSwitch details →Resume-Matcher details →
Swap a project
Keep HyperSwitch, compare it with
Keep Resume-Matcher, compare it with