HyperSwitchvsNATS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HyperSwitch | NATS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Fintech | #2 of 12 in Message Broker |
| GitHub stars | 45 506 | 20 954 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 676 | +192 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 18 |
| Latest release | v1.127.0 · 23 Sept 2026 | v2.14.9 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Go |
Which one should you pick?
HyperSwitch scores 81/100 against 80/100 for NATS, so it is the safer default.
NATS ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for HyperSwitch.
If you want the quickest setup, NATS is easier to run; HyperSwitch needs more configuration.
HyperSwitch is growing faster right now (+1 676 stars in 30 days).
HyperSwitch details →NATS details →
Swap a project
Keep HyperSwitch, compare it with
Keep NATS, compare it with