HuginnvsZero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Huginn | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 26 in Automation | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 50 165 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +181 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 9 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.26 · 26 Oct 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Ruby | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Huginn scores 80/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Huginn is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.
Huginn is growing faster right now (+181 stars in 30 days).
Huginn details →Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes details →
Swap a project
Keep Huginn, compare it with
Keep Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, compare it with