paperclipvsZero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| paperclip | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 108 301 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +26 937 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 9 |
| Latest release | v2026.1012.0 · 12 Oct 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
paperclip scores 88/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.
paperclip ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.
If you want the quickest setup, paperclip is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.
paperclip is growing faster right now (+26 937 stars in 30 days).
paperclip details →Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes details →
Swap a project
Keep paperclip, compare it with
Keep Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, compare it with