HuginnvsWildbox
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Huginn | Wildbox | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 26 in Automation | #56 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 50 174 | 134 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +184 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 10 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.26 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.12.2 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Huginn scores 80/100 against 44/100 for Wildbox, so it is the safer default.
Wildbox ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Huginn.
If you want the quickest setup, Huginn is easier to run; Wildbox needs more configuration.
Huginn is growing faster right now (+184 stars in 30 days).
Huginn details →Wildbox details →
Swap a project
Keep Huginn, compare it with
Keep Wildbox, compare it with