HuginnvsTypecho
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Huginn | Typecho | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 26 in Automation | #1 of 24 in Blogging |
| GitHub stars | 50 173 | 12 456 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +183 | +9 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 2 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.26 · 26 Oct 2026 | ci · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Huginn scores 80/100 against 66/100 for Typecho, so it is the safer default.
Huginn ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Typecho.
If you want the quickest setup, Typecho is easier to run; Huginn needs more configuration.
Huginn is growing faster right now (+183 stars in 30 days).
Huginn details →Typecho details →
Swap a project
Keep Huginn, compare it with
Keep Typecho, compare it with