Huginnvstransfer.sh
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Huginn | transfer.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 26 in Automation | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 50 164 | 15 905 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +180 | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.26 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Huginn scores 80/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.
Huginn ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.
If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; Huginn needs more configuration.
Huginn is growing faster right now (+180 stars in 30 days).
Huginn details →transfer.sh details →
Swap a project
Keep Huginn, compare it with
Keep transfer.sh, compare it with