HQBasevsMailcow
Two self-hosted Email projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HQBase | Mailcow | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #56 of 106 in Email | #2 of 106 in Email |
| GitHub stars | 351 | 13 713 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +215 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 16 |
| Latest release | v1.4.5 · 12 Oct 2026 | 2026-10 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Mailcow scores 77/100 against 50/100 for HQBase, so it is the safer default.
Mailcow ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for HQBase.
Mailcow is growing faster right now (+215 stars in 30 days).
HQBase details →Mailcow details →All Email projects →
Swap a project
Keep HQBase, compare it with
Keep Mailcow, compare it with