hothostvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hothost | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #80 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 181 | 17 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 44/100 for hothost, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; hothost needs more configuration.
hothost details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep hothost, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with