hothostvsSearXNG
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hothost | SearXNG | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #80 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 181 | 38 962 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 396 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
SearXNG scores 86/100 against 44/100 for hothost, so it is the safer default.
SearXNG is growing faster right now (+1 396 stars in 30 days).
hothost details →SearXNG details →
Swap a project
Keep hothost, compare it with
Keep SearXNG, compare it with