hostingvsZed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hosting | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 16 060 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +245 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 31 |
| Latest release | — | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) scores 80/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.
If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is growing faster right now (+245 stars in 30 days).
hosting details →Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) details →