hostingvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hosting | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 8 068 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +160 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
woodpecker-ci scores 73/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.
woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.
If you want the quickest setup, woodpecker-ci is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.
woodpecker-ci is growing faster right now (+160 stars in 30 days).
hosting details →woodpecker-ci details →