hostingvsWebCodex
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hosting | WebCodex | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #60 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 2 448 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 7 |
| Latest release | — | v0.4.6 · 4 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
WebCodex scores 55/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.
WebCodex ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.
If you want the quickest setup, WebCodex is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.
hosting details →WebCodex details →