hostingvsWastebin
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hosting | Wastebin | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #4 of 19 in Pastebins |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 880 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | 3.9.0 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Wastebin scores 56/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.
Wastebin ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.
If you want the quickest setup, Wastebin is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.
Wastebin is growing faster right now (+20 stars in 30 days).
hosting details →Wastebin details →