avideovsWastebin
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| avideo | Wastebin | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 36 in Video Streaming | #4 of 19 in Pastebins |
| GitHub stars | 2 108 | 880 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 11 |
| Latest release | v29.6.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | 3.9.0 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
avideo scores 58/100 against 56/100 for Wastebin, so it is the safer default.
avideo ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Wastebin.
If you want the quickest setup, Wastebin is easier to run; avideo needs more configuration.
Wastebin is growing faster right now (+20 stars in 30 days).
avideo details →Wastebin details →
Swap a project
Keep avideo, compare it with
Keep Wastebin, compare it with