hostingvsunopim
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hosting | unopim | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #1 of 6 in Product Management |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 11 045 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +48 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 17 |
| Latest release | — | v3.1.3 · 29 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
unopim scores 69/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.
unopim ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.
If you want the quickest setup, unopim is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.
unopim is growing faster right now (+48 stars in 30 days).
hosting details →unopim details →