hostingvsTypeType
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hosting | TypeType | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #66 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 471 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | v1.12.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
TypeType scores 48/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.
TypeType ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.
hosting details →TypeType details →