hostingvstrip2g
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hosting | trip2g | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #30 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 40 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 |
| Latest release | — | v0.12.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
trip2g scores 40/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.
trip2g ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.
If you want the quickest setup, trip2g is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.
hosting details →trip2g details →