hostingvsSyncWatch同步观影
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hosting | SyncWatch同步观影 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #24 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 141 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v2.4.4 · 6 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
SyncWatch同步观影 scores 46/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.
SyncWatch同步观影 ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.
If you want the quickest setup, SyncWatch同步观影 is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.
hosting details →SyncWatch同步观影 details →