hostingvsSerena-MCP
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hosting | Serena-MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #4 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 30 801 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 047 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 15 |
| Latest release | — | v2.1.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Serena-MCP scores 82/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.
Serena-MCP ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.
If you want the quickest setup, Serena-MCP is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.
Serena-MCP is growing faster right now (+1 047 stars in 30 days).
hosting details →Serena-MCP details →