avideovsSerena-MCP
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| avideo | Serena-MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 36 in Video Streaming | #4 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 2 108 | 30 801 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 | +1 047 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 15 |
| Latest release | v29.6.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v2.1.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Serena-MCP scores 82/100 against 58/100 for avideo, so it is the safer default.
Serena-MCP ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for avideo.
If you want the quickest setup, Serena-MCP is easier to run; avideo needs more configuration.
Serena-MCP is growing faster right now (+1 047 stars in 30 days).
avideo details →Serena-MCP details →
Swap a project
Keep avideo, compare it with
Keep Serena-MCP, compare it with