hostingvsscm-manager
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hosting | scm-manager | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #10 of 14 in Code Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 |
| Latest release | — | 3.11.4 · 11 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
scm-manager scores 53/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.
scm-manager ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.
If you want the quickest setup, scm-manager is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.
hosting details →scm-manager details →