hostingvsSandBase Harness
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hosting | SandBase Harness | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #169 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 637 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 |
| Latest release | — | v0.3.8 · 30 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
SandBase Harness scores 39/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.
SandBase Harness ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.
If you want the quickest setup, SandBase Harness is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.
SandBase Harness is growing faster right now (+1 stars in 30 days).
hosting details →SandBase Harness details →