hostingvsQGIS Web Client
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hosting | QGIS Web Client | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #9 of 12 in Maps |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 383 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | ci-latest-master · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
QGIS Web Client scores 57/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.
QGIS Web Client ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.
hosting details →QGIS Web Client details →