hostingvsQMReader
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hosting | QMReader | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #41 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 261 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 |
| Latest release | — | v1.0.14 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
QMReader scores 47/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.
QMReader ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.
If you want the quickest setup, QMReader is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.
hosting details →QMReader details →