hostingvsPhotoMigrator
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hosting | PhotoMigrator | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #21 of 41 in Photo Management |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 269 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 19 |
| Latest release | — | v4.7.0 · 19 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
PhotoMigrator scores 50/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.
PhotoMigrator ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.
If you want the quickest setup, PhotoMigrator is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.
PhotoMigrator is growing faster right now (+1 stars in 30 days).
hosting details →PhotoMigrator details →