horillavsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| horilla | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Human Resource Management (HRM) | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 1 478 | 89 717 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +47 | +2 428 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 17 |
| Latest release | 2.2.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | LGPL-2.1 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | HTML | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 60/100 for horilla, so it is the safer default.
World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for horilla.
If you want the quickest setup, horilla is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 428 stars in 30 days).
horilla details →World Monitor details →