Hoppscotch Community EditionvsZed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Hoppscotch Community Edition | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 13 in API | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 80 706 | 16 058 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +219 | +243 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 31 |
| Latest release | 2026.9.0 · 30 Sept 2026 | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Hoppscotch Community Edition scores 83/100 against 80/100 for Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), so it is the safer default.
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for Hoppscotch Community Edition.
If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; Hoppscotch Community Edition needs more configuration.
Hoppscotch Community Edition details →Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) details →
Swap a project
Keep Hoppscotch Community Edition, compare it with
Keep Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), compare it with