HiClawvs心潮动态心智系统
Two self-hosted AI Agents projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HiClaw | 心潮动态心智系统 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #146 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 5 894 | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +225 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | v2.6.0 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
HiClaw scores 67/100 against 44/100 for 心潮动态心智系统, so it is the safer default.
HiClaw ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for 心潮动态心智系统.
If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; 心潮动态心智系统 needs more configuration.
HiClaw is growing faster right now (+225 stars in 30 days).
HiClaw details →心潮动态心智系统 details →All AI Agents projects →