HiClawvswger
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HiClaw | wger | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 31 in Health & Fitness |
| GitHub stars | 5 886 | 7 202 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +223 | +241 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 4 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | 2.7 · 3 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
wger scores 73/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.
HiClaw ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for wger.
If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; wger needs more configuration.
HiClaw details →wger details →