HiClawvsWagtail
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HiClaw | Wagtail | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 885 | 20 593 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +222 | +88 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 19 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | v8.0.1 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Wagtail scores 79/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.
Wagtail ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for HiClaw.
If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; Wagtail needs more configuration.
HiClaw is growing faster right now (+222 stars in 30 days).
HiClaw details →Wagtail details →