HiClawvsUrbit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HiClaw | Urbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 5 886 | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +223 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | hoon |
Which one should you pick?
HiClaw scores 67/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.
HiClaw ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.
If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
HiClaw is growing faster right now (+223 stars in 30 days).
HiClaw details →Urbit details →