HiClawvsTypesense
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HiClaw | Typesense | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #31 of 209 in AI Agents | #6 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 5 889 | 27 063 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +220 | +470 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 4 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | v30.2 · 19 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | C |
Which one should you pick?
Typesense scores 79/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.
HiClaw ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Typesense.
Typesense is growing faster right now (+470 stars in 30 days).
HiClaw details →Typesense details →