HiClawvsSimpleX Chat
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HiClaw | SimpleX Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 5 886 | 19 612 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +223 | +142 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 12 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | v7.0.4 · 3 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Haskell |
Which one should you pick?
SimpleX Chat scores 74/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.
HiClaw ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for SimpleX Chat.
If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; SimpleX Chat needs more configuration.
HiClaw details →SimpleX Chat details →