HiClawvsRabbitMQ
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HiClaw | RabbitMQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #31 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 12 in Message Broker |
| GitHub stars | 5 889 | 13 949 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +220 | +74 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 14 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
RabbitMQ scores 77/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.
HiClaw ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for RabbitMQ.
If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; RabbitMQ needs more configuration.
HiClaw is growing faster right now (+220 stars in 30 days).
HiClaw details →RabbitMQ details →