HiClawvsProxmoxMCP-Plus
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HiClaw | ProxmoxMCP-Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #10 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 5 885 | 624 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +222 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 20 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | v0.6.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
HiClaw scores 67/100 against 54/100 for ProxmoxMCP-Plus, so it is the safer default.
ProxmoxMCP-Plus ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for HiClaw.
If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; ProxmoxMCP-Plus needs more configuration.
HiClaw is growing faster right now (+222 stars in 30 days).
HiClaw details →ProxmoxMCP-Plus details →