HiClawvsnocodb
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HiClaw | nocodb | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms |
| GitHub stars | 5 885 | 65 372 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +222 | +318 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 15 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
nocodb scores 81/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; nocodb needs more configuration.
HiClaw details →nocodb details →