HiClawvsNetworkOptimizer
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HiClaw | NetworkOptimizer | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #17 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 5 886 | 1 211 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +223 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 23 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | v2.10.3 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | C# |
Which one should you pick?
HiClaw scores 67/100 against 56/100 for NetworkOptimizer, so it is the safer default.
NetworkOptimizer ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for HiClaw.
If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; NetworkOptimizer needs more configuration.
HiClaw is growing faster right now (+223 stars in 30 days).
HiClaw details →NetworkOptimizer details →