HiClawvsmultica
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HiClaw | multica | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 84/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #10 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 5 886 | 54 141 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +223 | +2 899 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 87 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
multica scores 84/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.
multica ships more often: 87 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for HiClaw.
If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; multica needs more configuration.
multica is growing faster right now (+2 899 stars in 30 days).
HiClaw details →multica details →