hermes-agentvsibl.ai/os
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hermes-agent | ibl.ai/os | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 89/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 120 in AI Assistant | #65 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 258 049 | 793 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 626 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 36 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.22.5 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.182.2 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
hermes-agent scores 89/100 against 55/100 for ibl.ai/os, so it is the safer default.
hermes-agent ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for ibl.ai/os.
If you want the quickest setup, hermes-agent is easier to run; ibl.ai/os needs more configuration.
hermes-agent is growing faster right now (+9 626 stars in 30 days).
hermes-agent details →ibl.ai/os details →
Swap a project
Keep hermes-agent, compare it with
Keep ibl.ai/os, compare it with