HealthchecksvsWPMgr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | WPMgr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #16 of 18 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 468 | 165 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 9 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.61.198 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 48/100 for WPMgr, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for WPMgr.
Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+106 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →WPMgr details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep WPMgr, compare it with