HealthchecksvsWhisperLive---CPU
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | WhisperLive---CPU | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 10 468 | 4 338 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +46 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 3 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 64/100 for WhisperLive---CPU, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for WhisperLive---CPU.
Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+106 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →WhisperLive---CPU details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep WhisperLive---CPU, compare it with