Healthchecksvswanderer
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | wanderer | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #7 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 464 | 4 030 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +131 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 10 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.21.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 64/100 for wanderer, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for wanderer.
Healthchecks details →wanderer details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep wanderer, compare it with