HealthchecksvsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 10 465 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 9 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.
Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+107 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →UUSEC WAF details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep UUSEC WAF, compare it with